-
Do we need a theory for blended learning? | Tony Bates
- asynchronous online learning has generally reflected a more constructivist approach.
-
-
AUTOMATIC READABILITY CHECKER, a Free Readability Formula Consensus Calculator
Saturday, October 23, 2021
Weekly Sporto bookmarks (weekly)
Saturday, October 16, 2021
Saturday, October 9, 2021
Weekly Sporto bookmarks (weekly)
-
Use point-biserial to discriminate high and low performers | GradeHub
- Point-biserial helps instructors know what makes a good or bad test question, and is essential for faculty developing exams for large class sections. The deciding factor between a good or bad test question is its ability to “discriminate” students who have mastered the material from those who have not. The key is to look at who is getting the item correct and who is getting it wrong. If only the high performing students are getting a question correct, it might be an indicator that the item is too hard.
- One of the most accepted ways to evaluate an item is to calculate a correlation. The technical term for the correlation used in exam item analysis is a point-biserial.
- A high point-biserial reflects the fact that the item is doing a good job of discriminating your high-performing students from your low-performing students.
- Values for point-biserial range from -1.00 to 1.00. Values of 0.15 or higher mean that the item is performing well
- Items with incorrect keys will show point-biserials close to or below zero.
- Point-biserials that are negative signal a big problem. With this pattern, the high-performing students are getting the answer wrong, and the low and/or mid performing students are getting it right
-
-
Digital Accessibility Foundations - Free Online Course | Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) | W3C
Saturday, September 25, 2021
Saturday, September 18, 2021
Saturday, September 4, 2021
Saturday, August 28, 2021
Weekly Sporto bookmarks (weekly)
-
Open Badge eCredentials for Extended Enterprise Learning | Littoraly Don
- It comes with a twist, focusing not on employee development, but on partner development in the value chain, with the goal of measurably improving customer satisfaction and sales growth.
-
-
- initially designed to recognise informal learning, Open Badges have been used efficiently by the enemies of informal learning and Open Recognition. If we do not pay attention, Open Badges could become the weapons of mass destruction of informal learning!
- Open Badges are overtly used to submit informal learning to the codes and rules of formal learning and, in doing so, destroy the very soul of informal learning.
- On our view, recent government attempts to try to formalise informal learning suggests an almost obsessive distrust of the role of judgement through agency
- The sub-text is that there is no recognition, at least, no valuable recognition, if not performed by or within an authoritative institution — school, college, university, employer, public authority, etc.
- Open Badges were designed to support the formal recognition of informal learning. They were never designed to address the informal recognition of informal learning.
- the actual place of informal recognition in those projects remains principally ancillary to formal recognition
- If institutions of formal education love badges, it is not so much because they are the instruments of innovation and transformation, but because they allow them to continue business as usual while pretending to do something new
- Another critical issue is that, before their invention, there was a clear separation between the formal and the informal spaces, and informal meant a sense of freedom and independence, at least not being under the scrutiny of institutions of formal education.
-
-
Towards an Ethical Framework for Open Recognition | by Serge Ravet | Open Recognition | Medium
-
Kirkpatrick and Open Badges: Can do better! | by Serge Ravet | Medium
-
Competency Badges: the tail wagging the dog? | by Serge Ravet | Medium
-
Learning Futures – Reflections on Learning, Technologies, Identities and Trust
-
Full article: Wikipedia and open recognition: writing the future of work
-
All about Open Badges – Open Badge Info : Tout savoir sur les Open Badges
Saturday, August 7, 2021
Saturday, July 31, 2021
Weekly Sporto bookmarks (weekly)
-
Screenreader Comparisons | Paths to Technology | Perkins eLearning
-
Cómo hacer que la información sea accesible para todos | European Blind Union
-
6 consejos para crear contenido accesible en Word | EDUCACIÓN 3.0
-
(120) Comprobación de accesibilidad de documentos Office - YouTube
-
Crear un documento de Microsoft Word accesible - Recomendaciones - Accesibles
-
VÃdeo de aprendizaje sobre accesibilidad - Soporte de Office
-
Haga que los documentos de Word sean accesibles para personas con discapacidades.
-
An Integrative Approach to Student Understanding and Learning | Faculty Focus
Saturday, July 24, 2021
Weekly Sporto bookmarks (weekly)
-
- technological environment means cheating is a more complex question than it once was
- In normal study we're asking students to collaborate together and learn together, because we know that social learning is really important for building up knowledge and sharing knowledge... so we're actually asking students to do this all the time, and then we get to an exam environment and we're asking for individual knowledge."
- rethink the entire area of online examinations, academic integrity and [how] academic misconduct is communicated to students."
-
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)